Data engineering & integration · Data quality & reconciliation
02 AI & Machine LearningApplied machine learning · Generative AI
03 Software & Product EngineeringCustom application development · Legacy modernization
04 Cloud & CybersecurityCloud migration & modernization · Cloud operations & support
05 Acquisition & Financial ManagementAnalysis of Alternatives · Market research & COTS/NDI evaluation
06 Program & Project ManagementProgram management & PMO support · Process improvement
Reconcile the record · instrument the definitions · ship the smallest thing that runs · close the loop.
Readiness, sustainment, acquisition and program financial systems.
IntelligenceSecure analytics, transcription and technical talent for missions.
Federal CivilianEnterprise cloud, case workflows and public financial accountability.
State, Local & TribalFederal-grade accountability on a state or municipal budget.
HealthReliability, forecasting and workforce analytics for clinical operations.
Commercial & Small BusinessFor organizations that must defend an AI-assisted decision.
Where a customer can't be named, the component and scale are characterized instead.
ALL WORKGAO, CBO and IG findings, read closely and written up plainly.
ALL INSIGHTSEngineering, data science, and Ghost Works.
OPEN ROLES INTERNSHIPSHands-on projects and practical challenges, including our Drone Development internship.
EXPLORE INTERNSHIPS →The structural argument for firms that can close the gap between analysis and working software.
The standard consulting engagement ends with a recommendation. If acting on it requires software, the recommendation becomes a requirement, the requirement becomes a solicitation, and the solicitation becomes another twelve to eighteen months.
By the time a vendor is selected, the analysis is stale and the people who did it are gone. The new team reconstructs the reasoning from a document, and a portion of the original insight is simply lost.
We were built the other way round. When an engagement surfaces a gap that can be closed in code, we close it. Every product in our portfolio began as something a client needed and could not buy.
This is not an argument that every problem is a software problem. Most are not. It is an argument that the handoff between analysis and delivery is where a great deal of federal value quietly evaporates.
The practical consequence for a customer is that the people who wrote the analysis are the people who answer for the system. That accountability is difficult to reproduce across a contract boundary.
If this describes a problem your program is carrying, the conversation starts with the question two systems answer differently.
START A CONVERSATION